Follow Christiane on social media:

On Twitter + Facebook + Instagram Amanpour producers on Twitter

What time is Amanpour on CNN?

Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.

Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.

Benghazi point man explains why he wasn’t at hearing

May 8th, 2013
05:13 PM ET

By Samuel Burke, CNN

Congressional hearings Wednesday on the September 11, 2012 Benghazi, Libya attacks were missing a key player in the affair.

Thomas Pickering, former ambassador and a top State Department official, is the author of the after-action report on the attack, which left four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, dead.

The chairman of the House committee overseeing the hearing, Congressman Darrell Issa, said Pickering had refused to attend.

Pickering called Issa’s statement “colossally misinformed,” in an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on Wednesday. 

RELATED: Will Libya fall apart after Gadhafi?

Pickering said that he had made it clear to Issa, via the White House, that he was “ready to come at any time.” But according to him, Congressman Issa didn’t invite him, but rather informed Pickering that he might want to take up his offer sometime in the future.

Gregory Hicks, the number two in charge in Libya at the time of the attack, delivered a harsh condemnation of how his government responded to the attacks.

Pickering said he admires Hicks greatly, and heard much of the testimony before, but said he does not recall some of the specifics that Hicks mentioned about the unavailability of aircraft to respond. Pickering said he went back to check the record again, and did not find a specific mention of that issue.

Pickering’s report found that there was not enough security around the Benghazi mission, and that changes in personnel led to a lack of continuity at the mission, which in turn led to lack of security.

He also found that some of the State Department employees there that weren’t sufficiently versed in the type of skills needed at a mission as important as the one in Libya.

The issue has become highly politicized in Washington, according to Pickering.

“I think that the political Indian hand wrestling that is going on around this is a real distraction to the central question – implementation of the recommendations," Pickering said. "It needs time and effort. It needs congressional cooperation – the kind of thing that seems absent in Washington.”

READ MORE: The Libyan who knew too much


Filed under:  Latest Episode • Libya
soundoff (4 Responses)
  1. Francis Smidt

    Why has CNN not covered this story from the begin and why now is the only interview that of on of the co conspiritor Of course he cya he one of the covering agents who scrubbed talking points and can't remenber and who refuse to allow other to testify Again Cnn cover up partner

    May 9, 2013 at 6:56 am | Reply
  2. Parlin

    Where are the hearings about fighting Wars under False Pretenses?

    May 9, 2013 at 9:39 am | Reply
    • zaqaz

      Good question. I want to know why Clinton was warning us about Iraq in 1998. He warned us about WMD, and we never found any. Sounds like he ought to be tried.

      May 9, 2013 at 4:44 pm | Reply
  3. albert

    Issa was “colossally misinformed,” because Pickering communicated "through the White House". Apparently they didn't get their "talking points" straight again.

    May 9, 2013 at 4:49 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.