On Twitter + Facebook + Instagram
Amanpour producers on Twitter
Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.
By Samuel Burke, CNN
Evidence of chemical weapons use gets harder to find with each passing day in Syria.
The Assad regime is blocking U.N. special investigators from entering the country as the Obama administration continues to seek concrete proof.
“It is publicly known that Syria has the largest active chemical weapons program in the world," President Obama's former chief adviser on all matters relating to weapons of mass destruction, Gary Samore, told CNN's Christiane Amanpour on Wednesday.
RELATED: Syrian opposition PM: Arm us, not the extremists
The only other country that might have a comparable stockpile might be North Korea, about which we know very little, according to Samore.
"The agents that are said to be in Syria's position are mustard gas, which is a choking agent, and two kinds of nerve gas, sarin and VX," Samore told told Amanpour. "They have a well-developed arsenal for delivering these chemical weapons through aerial bombs, Scud missile warheads, artillery shells and rockets."
It would be a very daunting operation for the U.S. and its allies to secure those stockpiles.
"It would require a very large force to be inserted into many different facilities," Samore said. "And, of course, that force would have to be protected."
This is one of the reasons, he said, why the Obama administration is being very careful about deciding when its red line – Syria using chemical weapons – has been crossed.
"Military options are pretty unattractive to either try to destroy the chemical weapons at storage facilities or to seize them," Samore said. "For that reason, I think it's unlikely that those kinds of military steps will be taken until there's a really clear evidence of large-scale indiscriminate use that removes any doubt about what has happened."
READ MORE: Israel: We do not hide our red lines
“It is publicly known that Syria has the largest active chemical weapons program in the world,..." – it is publicly known due to your news, but are the sources the same as about WMD in Iraq or some other sources?
Well, there WERE WMD in Iraq... Unless, of course, you insist that Saddam Hussein somehow managed to KILL tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians by USING chemical weapons and NOT have them at the same time...
there WERE WMD in Iraq... in EIGHTIES. apparently, Bush and Condolleezzaa forgot to clarify it.
Are you forgetting that the Iraqi people convicted 'Chemical Ali' for using gas on the Kurds... they had them; just as the first wave of propaganda suggested that the WMDs were a serious problem the leftist propaganda is just as bad to suggest that there were none...
There were no WMD in Iraq, Bush said so himself. If I were Obama I would think again before making that same mistake again and the result ofcourse will be, a lot of young American lives lost for nothing!
Dimmus, you are right in what you said.
Neither Bush nor any other American official said that that THERE WERE NO WMD in Iraq. At most they could say that NO WMD WERE FOUND there... A HUGE difference.
I can't believe the US is wussing out. What other weapon would kill the cats, dogs, sheep and chickens along with the humans. Someone needs to both kill Assad and his family, they also need to install a secular government. Said government should go our searching for those who attacked in this fashion, and kill them, too. A bit too Old Testament for you? Think about it. They are taught to hate in their schools and homes. Down to the third and fourth generation.
so...who do you suggest should go and kill them??...American military? nope you my dear you can go there and kill them with your very own hands
We have very small nukes that could vaporize all the plants.
Israel's plan is working like a clock. Soon millions will be murdered and billions will be earned by few.
Do you know something about Israel's plans no one else (including Israelis) knows about?
So I think the bottom line is to wait for Syria to cross the 'red line' but before this happen, all the civilians must be secured already.
Are you seriously saying Syria has more chemical weapons than the US? How many does Israel have for that matter, along with 100ks of nukes?
Syria using chemical weapons is a red line, but its ok for the US to use them? Is our short term memory that bad? Does no one remember the Agent Orange in Vietnam?
Just to clarify, Agent Orange was not ment as an anti-human weapon, it was a defoliate weapon that happens to give people TB and other bad things.
Agent orange was used to destroy the thick jungles. It was not used as a chemical weapon against humans. It was only after the usage did the side effects were discovered.
I had watched one of the greatest con jobs by Colin Powell in the UN about 10 years back. Currently again it looks strangely familiar. But then it is for the greater good and world peace. Hence, i reconcile and sip my Starbucks.
Colin Powell was duped by 'W" and Trickie Dickie Cheney and Donnie Rummie to make that presentation. If they would have actually listened to Powell, I believe the Mid East would be in one helluva lot better situation at this moment
So there is still no evidence of chemicals use – no result of analyses was made public...... by any interest groups
Who cares. The quicker they kill each other off, the better.
Rebels are using chemicals weapons according to UN reports
You have got it SPOT on: And no by 5 yrs the global rervese currency (dollar) will have collapsed and the elites will be able to create their new one world government from the ashes.Don't worry,as dumb and easily led as you sound you'll probably be among the first led to the slaughter.
It makes no sense that Assad would deploy chem weapons. The lightly-sourced accusations of chem weapons sound all too familiar to the WMD claims that were used to justify the US-led invasion of Iraq.
I just hope Syria's case will not metamorphose into what we have in Iraq in all its ramification.
FYI, Mustard gas (yperite or sulfur mustard) is a blistering or vesicant agent, rather than a choking one. Just effin' Google it if you don't have the previous knowledge. It works by alkylating the guanine nucleotide in DNA strands, which prevents cellular division and generally leads directly to programmed cell death. Or in simpler terms, it creates huge blisters and you die.
Invasion of Syria will not occur even if evidence is discovered. So you can all stop worrying and comparing this to the Iraq invasion. The govt knows it cannot pull the wool over our eyes so easily after the Bush fiasco. Also, we simply cannot afford it. If anything, we would pound them from the air in support of the rebellion. Boots on the ground? Pointless unless we intended to keep it.
Other than Syria and North Korea, does no other country having chemicals in thei country?
The problem is not HAVING chemicals in the country but USING these chemicals to kill people.
Monday – Friday:
1900 & 2200 London
2000 & 2300 CET
2:00pm & 5:00pm ET
Asia, Tuesday – Saturday: