Follow Christiane on social media:

On Twitter + Facebook + Instagram Amanpour producers on Twitter

What time is Amanpour on CNN?

Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.

Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.

ISIS killings highlight lack of Iraq intelligence assets, says former UK Intel Chief

September 3rd, 2014
03:19 PM ET

By Mick Krever, CNN

The brutal ISIS killings of two American journalists, and the threat to kill a British hostage, highlight the fact that America and Britain have very little intelligence capability in the country, former UK Security and Counter-Terrorism Minister Pauline Neville-Jones said Wednesday.

“One of the things I think that looking back it was certainly a mistake, was that when both the U.S. and U.K. left Iraq, the intelligence assets were removed at the same time,” she told CNN’s Michael Holmes, in for Christiane Amanpour.

“That has meant there is a real hole in our collective knowledge of what’s been going on on the ground.”

“That has to be restored, because, you know, you don’t in the end conduct really successful military operations of any kind in the absence of good intelligence. So that’s urgent, important, and I think it’s underway.”

All eyes are on the U.K. as Western leaders step up their rhetoric on ISIS. Not only is a British national threatened with being the next to die, the executioner of the two American journalists speaks with a London accent in videos released by ISIS.

British Prime Minister David Cameron on Wednesday said the U.K. “will not be cowed by these barbaric killers.” U.S. Vice President Joe Biden said America would follow ISIS “to the gates of hell.”

“My belief is that we are getting nearer to the point in which the UK will feel that it is right to up its level of involvement,” Neville-Jones said.

Last summer, British parliament blocked Cameron from striking Syria in response to the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons. But a year on, with a rash of extremist Brits traveling to wage jihad in Iraq and Syria, Neville-Jones opined that there may be more openness to involvement.

“I think since then the mood has changed in this country. We’re not one actually that’s going to I think back away from international challenges, and from the implications from the terrorist threat that we face.”

“I don’t think it’s a question of boots on the ground, but I think accompanying the U.S. in some kind of military operation – I think there will be increased contribution, and I think an increasingly overt one.”

It is critical, she said, that an international coalition is behind any operation.

The ISIS murders of Westerners does not change how the government will approach the problem, she said, but it does increase the urgency.

“It certainly, I think, stimulates public opinion and makes people realize that when the government talks about a threat, it is real.”

“I hope our special forces will be able to do something about this man’s safety. But this is a brutal organization and he is obviously in very great danger.”


Filed under:  Iraq • Latest Episode • Syria
soundoff (3 Responses)
  1. Erm...

    Bambi helped the ISIS in Syria, everyone applauded.

    Here come the consequences.

    September 4, 2014 at 4:49 am | Reply
  2. Sindbad

    The terrorist Iran regime revolutionary guards and hezbollah and asaeb are in Iraq to occupy it:

    http://farsi.alarabiya.net/fa/iran/2014/09/04/%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%AF%D9%88-%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%AF%DB%8C-%D9%88-%D9%BE%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%A9%D9%88%D8%A8%DB%8C-%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85-%D8%B3%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A2%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%84%DB%8C-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82-%D9%BE%D8%B3-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%B4%DA%A9%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B4.html

    September 4, 2014 at 9:03 pm | Reply
  3. RLTJ's

    As I understand things, from reading news and reports that include probable leaks from intelligence, both beheading happened in Syria. And then there are all the talks about U.S. striking ISIS in Syria. As an observer I find that interesting. It will have to be arrange with Assad which U.S. has already ruled out. It means U.S. to strike ISIS there Syrians like it or not. It smacks aggression that U.S. will have to justify so it wont look like that.

    Will it work? Look at all the Syrian cities under rebels control. Assad has been doing that with little luck. Perhaps U.S. with a more advance technical capabilities can do a little more than Assad. More rubble and more civilian deaths is what they promise. And then U.S. will have to put boots on the ground for result it hopes for. Again, Syrians like that or not.

    Will they work? Assad been at them. He seems helpless and nowhere. Maybe they can swallow their pride with U.S doing their job for them.

    September 4, 2014 at 10:52 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.