Follow Christiane on social media:

On Twitter + Facebook + Instagram Amanpour producers on Twitter

What time is Amanpour on CNN?

Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.

Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.

Hong Kong demonstrators may scuttle democracy progress, says pro-Beijing legislator

October 7th, 2014
02:54 PM ET

By Mick Krever, CNN

By disrupting life in Hong Kong and rejecting Beijing’s ruling on how Hong Kong should be governed, pro-democracy demonstrators there may actually be scuttling progress on democracy, pro-Beijing Hong Kong legislator Regina Ip told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on Tuesday.

“In terms of guarantee of personal freedoms and rights, we were free before we became democratic,” Ip said. “The democratic process only started getting under way in the 1980s, very late in the colonial era. And we've made a lot more progress since 1997.”

“I fully understand and sympathize with [the protesters’] aspirations. But they also need to recognize that our democratic model is laid down in the basic law.”

“We are not an independent country. We are part of one country.”

Students and pro-democracy activists clogged Hong Kong’s central business district through the end of last week, protesting a ruling by China that Hong Kong residents would be able to directly elect their chief executive, but only from a list of Beijing-approved candidates.

Many protesters left the streets over the weekend after their leaders agreed to negotiations with the office of the chief executive, C.Y. Leung. They have promised, however, to return to the streets if they believe their demands are not being met.

“I think the government is trying very hard to resolve the disputes as peacefully as possible,” Ip, who is the former security chief of Hong Kong, said.

A fellow Hong Kong legislator, Claudia Mo, told Amanpour last month that China is “essentially very insecure and paranoid,” and is therefore playing tough with Hong Kong.

“The message,” Mo said, is “‘We don't care about Hong Kong anymore. Hong Kong is disposable.’”

“I totally disagree with her,” Ip said. “Hong Kong is the most international city of China; it is a very important southern gateway, and very important showcase to Taiwan.”

“I think China is becoming modern through territories like Taiwan and Hong Kong, learning about the democratic process. So I disagree with Claudia. I think if we could make the democratic model and let the basic law work in Hong Kong, we will be contributing to China's modernization.”

Ip has a somewhat controversial past with issues of democracy.

She has previously told The New York Times that while she supports and understands the “normative justifications for a democratic system … the big question in my mind is in what way more democracy added value.”

“We are within reaching distance of voting for our chief executive by universal suffrage,” she told Amanpour. “But efficiency and effectiveness have suffered.”

“Our legislature can be described as dysfunctional. The pro-democratic camp is practically declaring warfare on the government. So nothing is getting done.”

“I believe all systems of government must be able to deliver in terms of improving the livelihood and the welfare of the people.”

In an interview with Amanpour last month, Anson Chan – a former chief secretary of Hong Kong, who ran and won against Ip in a legislative election in 2007 – said that China was not living up to its commitments under the Basic Law, the document that underpinned Hong Kong’s transfer from British to Chinese rule in 1997.

“The basic law in black-and-white says universal suffrage means the right not only to vote but the right of every permanent Hong Kong resident to vote,” Chan said. “It says that the nominating committee for the election of the chief executive have to be broadly representative and the nomination process has to be democratic.”

Ip said that Chan was “largely correct,” but said that China is in fact living up to this commitment.

“The nominating committee, which should be discussed in the next few months, is broadly representative.”

“And we could broaden it if stage two of the consultation to discuss the details to be set out in local legislation, if that could get under way. But we can't do that until the demonstrations have come to an end.”

Ip told Amanpour that while she is “very impressed by the passion of the students,” and the fact that they have remained peaceful, that did not justify their actions.

“It is also a fact that they are unlawful, and they have obstructed traffic to a large extent, disrupting the life of many, causing many to lose business and even to lose jobs.”

“And as some members of the public have said, they can exercise their freedom, but they cannot interfere with other people's freedom to get to work in a convenient manner.”

“So I think they should also bear that in mind.”


Filed under:  China • Christiane Amanpour • Hong Kong • Latest Episode
soundoff (6 Responses)
  1. Mike

    Figures that a pro-beijing politician would say this. She lost all credibility when she said China was becoming "mondern through territories like Taiwan". Last I checked China was threatening Taiwan with hundreds of missiles and forceful reunification. Part of its territory? Absolutely not.

    October 8, 2014 at 7:23 am | Reply
  2. Ed

    As a Hong Kong resident, I am extremely angry with these student terrorists. They are bullies, reckless, and irresponsible. I applause the HK government's patience in dealing with these minors who are demanding equal negotiation rights with the government. I don't think they can even write an essay on what is democracy based on their ubsurd behavior during the past 10 days.

    October 8, 2014 at 9:42 am | Reply
    • Ezz

      I'm pretty sure they can write a better essay on democracy than you dude and I seriously doubt that you're a Hong Kong Resident. It's a joke when you're saying President Xi is demanding ZERO tolerance when his family pretty much symbolised bribery and corruption. If one day President Xi can be transparent of his family's wealth background including his off-shores account and his tens of millions of real estate in HK, then we'll believe him. Strangely the top senior party members that are all arrested belonged to Jiang Zemin faction. Internal Rival faction feud much?
      As for making judicial court transparent........ We should see what real concrete work has been done for the next year before commenting.
      China Daily is well know for being one of the propaganda website China created. Can you give other independent China site for us to pursue?

      October 8, 2014 at 12:50 pm | Reply
  3. Ed

    Many people comment about China without any real understanding of what is China. They make superficial comments based on what they read on the internet. President Xi is taking action against bribery and corruption on a scale that has never been seen before since the founding of PRC. Top senior party members are being arrested and President Xi is demanding zero tolerance against bribery and corruption. He is also making the judicial court transparent. A check and balance system is being created to prevent uncontrolled power abuse. We all know absolute power corrupts absolutely. Do visit http://www.chinadaily.com.cn and you can read what is happening in China on a real time basis.

    October 8, 2014 at 9:57 am | Reply
  4. Rob

    What an old dried up argument. it's a threat levied by the establishment. It states that by standing up for yourself, you will actually force regression from progress. That argument is made to keep people in their place. I wonder if any oppressed people ever made progress by shutting up and complying with the very powers that oppress.

    October 8, 2014 at 1:14 pm | Reply
  5. Mike

    Ed, so because he is rooting out corruption, its okay to crush a democratic movement? How the the two even remotely related?

    October 8, 2014 at 6:44 pm | Reply

Post a comment


 

CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.