Amanpour

And now your feedback:

[cnn-photo-caption image=http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/11/17/feedback.jpg caption="Christiane – all ears for the feedback."]

The exclusive interview with the Afghanistan’s Minister of Interior that dealt with combating claims of corruption from a Karzai rival and former presidential candidate proved popular among Amanpour’s audience.  Most commentary included a variety of mixed reactions combined with concern and “hope for the best” by the majority of viewers.

What are your thoughts on the program and what other viewers are saying? Please leave your comments: 

CNN MAILBOX

– Patricia Shamseldin

– Marlin Morris Salem

– Henry Garner

Glaucio Sombra

It is an approach from the Jewish American lobby that is not feeling comfortable with the policies of the United States towards Israel. This may change according to the incipient work of Baraq Obama with the two wars prevailing in the Middle East; Israel appears to be less important as usual than Afghanistan and Iraq to say.

Luis Fernando Linares

The emergence of groups like J Street is promising, but AIPAC has been very effective in continuing the harmful status quo. President Obama would have to be in a second term to be tougher on Israel without worrying about reelection. Here is the U.S. the history of the Levant is whitewashed making the Israelis appear innocent and the Palestinians like savages. It's hard to debate such an important issue here without being labeled anti-Semitic.

Aaron Gaudio

I'm all for us taking a harder stance with Israel, and a diplomatic resolution to the Palestinian question. But I think it's a bit unfair to blame our Israeli policy solely on AIPAC. They are big players, for sure, but not the only players.

Dawn Young

I think the constitution that says America will not form a government based on a religion, should be enough, and I think we should collectively stop recognizing them as a government.

DO YOU AGREE WITH THE OTHER VIEWERS? DISAGREE? WANT TO ADD TO WHAT THEY SAID? COMMENT HERE: