Follow Christiane on social media:
What time is Amanpour on CNN?
Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.
Is now the time to negotiate with the Taliban?
By Tom Evans
Sr. Writer, AMANPOUR.
(CNN) - The Taliban may have reached the peak of their military achievements in the War in Afghanistan, one of the world's top authorities on the Taliban said Monday.
And that position of relative strength might make them more amenable to talks, Pakistani journalist and author Ahmed Rashid said in an interview with CNN's Christiane Amanpour.
""They can't go much further than where they are now," Rashid said. "They're across the country. They're having shadow governors and shadow government in all the major provinces, but they can't take the cities because of NATO firepower. They can't create a populist movement against the Americans. They tried and failed to do that."
"So in a way," Rashid added, "the Taliban are in a very strong position, which actually might make them more amenable for talks right now."
His comments came as Afghan President Hamid Karzai steps up his efforts to reconcile with Taliban fighters and reintegrate them with Afghan society. In Kabul on Sunday, Karzai said, "The Taliban are welcome to return to their own country and work for peace in order for us to be able then to have the U.S. and other forces have the freedom to go back home."
Karzai was renewing an appeal he made at the London Conference on Afghanistan last week. At the conference, Afghanistan and world powers agreed to establish a $500 million "pay-for-peace" fund to try to convince rank-and-file Taliban members to give up the fight, even as the U.S. and its allies send more than 30,000 additional troops to the country - the so-called "surge."
Georgetown University's Christine Fair, who has analyzed Taliban suicide attacks in Afghanistan for the U.N., agreed with Rashid's assessment and said now is the time to offer them an opportunity for reconciliation.
"The surge is really focusing on controlling major urban populations, so from the point of view of the Taliban this is going to be an ideal time for them to try to reach some deal," she said. "And to be very clear, I support reconciliation. My concern is that the reintegration plan doesn't go far enough."
She said to be successful, reintegration requires more than just financial incentives. "You also need political incentives to bring them into the picture," she added.
Alex Thier, director for Afghanistan and Pakistan at the U.S. Institute of Peace, was more cautious about the possibility of convincing the Taliban to strike some kind of deal with the Karzai government.
"They are not particularly amenable to compromise. So while I agree that the Taliban in some ways may be reaching the height of their power, I'm not sure that they know that," he said.
"They've demonstrated repeatedly that they are willing to press ahead in the face of uncertainty and danger, as they did during the civil war when it was far from clear that they would achieve what they did," he added. "And of course, after September 11, they were in some ways offered to keep Afghanistan if they turned over Bin Laden, and they refused to, and lost it all."
Thier said there are also concerns among Afghanistan's ethnic minorities about doing any kind of deal with the Taliban. "They (ethnic minorities) certainly have the power to end that prospect," he added.
Fair emphasized the importance of making the peace effort an Afghan process. "What the United States should actually do is really be thinking about Plan B," she said.
"What are our interests in Afghanistan? Should we be looking for ways to protect ourselves against al Qaeda? Should we be looking at the possibility that Pakistan becomes the locus of our security interests?"
Fair said that in her opinion, at some point the Taliban will return to Kabul, so it's important for the U.S. to be thinking about its national interest in light of that potential reality.
@camanpour on Twitter
What? Are you kidding me, reintegration...no, they will "take the money and run" buying more weapons and causing more damage around the globe. Paying off the Taliban fighters because they lack jobs, opportunity, etc., why don't we pay the American worker who has the same issues right in our own homeland. What a ridiculous, insulting proposal. Wake up America! Money talks, but at what cost? America seems to take care of everyone else around the globe, why doesn't our government take care of it's own citizens for a change. The thought of Afghanistan and world powers agreeing to establish a $500 million "pay-for-peace" fund to try to convince rank-and-file Taliban members to give up the fight is absurd. How about we finally take care of your own citizens in America and the borders that surround us.
btw, Christiane Amanpour you are one of the best reporters ever.
Negotiation with the Taliban may shorten the conflict insignificantly, however, not to negotiate will prolong the conflict indefinitely.
Is good to reconcile with the taliban for the paece of the world.
Several things are clear by now:
1. US military power will not destroy the Taliban.
2. President Karzai whom the US put in charge of Afghanistan now wants reconciliation with the Taliban.
3. Most Afghans want the US military to cease operations, drone bombings and other lethal attacks that inevitably kill innocent men, women and children,
4. There is no way the US is going to establish an American style "democratic" national government in that firmly tribablized society.
Surely its is in the self-interest of the United States and of the Afghan peoplr that the U S military be withdrawn soon, immediately, so that the Afghans can sort out their governance problems among themselves. American involvement should be confined to massive economic aid funneled largely through independent private agencies such as the foundation headed by Greg Mortenson (author of "Three Cups of Tea") who has been building schools for girls in that region for several years and has learned how really to "win the hearts and minds" of these struggling peoples.
We organize compiled a directory of the maximum effort payday allow lenders http://www.uspaydayloansreviews.com payment those times when a true emergency hits, and your inadequate commendation prevents you from winning an emergency loan from elsewhere. To rank these payday lenders we scored them on how lively the credit was deposited into an account, and how much consequence profit was added. We be struck by also provided a counsel on how to avoid the less fussy lenders and also payday advance alternatives for you to consider.
The nicest auto bond companies make available more than a gross rate here: http://www.usinsurancereviews.com. They also suggest broad coverage, alive buyer stick, and a fair, prompt claims process backed by jam-packed financials. Six companies—USAA, Amica, Erie, Geico, Esurance, and Majestic Allotment—stood loose in our evaluation, but all 14 of our acme picks are trusted providers good considering.
деревянные рамы для зеркал или zerkaloff
https://bagemika.ru/catalog/product/zerkalo-v-rame-145.html
мтз погрузчики или самопогрузчик
https://td-l-market.ru/shop/product/vily-3-kh-pikovyye
курс сценаристов бесплатно или курсы продюсирования онлайн
https://kinomaker.online/kinofiestival
косметика для чистки кожи или уход за жирной кожей лица
https://timeblock.ru/news/page/3/
уход за кожей женщине или нутрицевтики
https://timeblock.ru/timeblock-4-weeks-vysokoehffektivnoe-lechenie/