Follow Christiane on social media:
On Twitter + Facebook + Instagram Amanpour producers on Twitter
What time is Amanpour on CNN?
Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.
Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.
Iran after Ahmadinejad
June 15th, 2013
09:37 AM ET
CNN's Christiane Amanpour speaks with Ambassador Thomas Pickering about Iran after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
@camanpour on Twitter
Liberties: Some serious food for thought this holiday weekend.
Join the discussion at libertiesjournal.com https://t.co/Zv6brQXH3x
RT @hari: If you can read this thread, there is already plenty to be thankful for tonight.
The frontline workers keeping people alive rig…
Pope Francis: A Crisis Reveals What Is in Our Hearts nytimes.com/2020/11/26/opi…
via â@nytopiniononânytimes.com/2020/11/25/opi…jvxI
RT @camanpour: If you only watch one thing today, make it this. The bravery of Chelsea Walsh is extraordinary.
This Thanksgiving, we shou…
Selecting this guy as next president, shows just how desperate and hopeless people are for change in Iran but they will be all disappointed.
Ms Amanpour, you are biased and distorting the facts. You must resign because I throw up everytime I see you on cnn. The world has had enough of you..!
This is almost a textbook example of how hate-prejudice works.
HE says he throws up – THEREFORE she must quit her job to spare him this vomiting. FURTHERMORE, his vomiting is (somehow?) proof that the world has "had enough" of her.
From his vomiting to a declaration of what the whole WORLD wants is the kind of leap that only prejudiced haters can do with aplomb.
Calling her biased and prejudiced is slapping his OWN bias and prejudice on someone else, hoping nobody will notice his own. He CLAIMS she's biased and prejudiced, while he proclaims his OWN.
Please note, Mr. Tunk, that nobody cares if you yark your cookies – or when, or why.
Repeat: Nobody CARES.
Please Christiane , Take a look this vÃdeo and talk about
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=AIBYEXLGdSg#!
Please cover Taksim, Turkey right now...police attacked the people in the park and thousands are walking to Taksim now
I was just contemplating : What would the CIA media machine be talking about now if someone else had won the election? Ballot box rigging or unfair election for example.....etc.
I'm still waiting for an explanation of: "there are also a couple of reformist show candidates, fig-leaves really as they are considered too weak and too unpopular to stand any chance at all"
from http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/22/amanpour-explains-irans-presidential-election/?hpt=hp_bn9
How does one dismiss a countries' entire democratic elections when in the USA it is a two horse race and not even your employer (CNN) could bother to provide any of the other candidates (yes there were more than two in the US elections!) a chance to speak?
I simply struggle to understand how a hard hitting journalist like Amanpour justifies her critique of Iran in this light.
It's been a couple days since my post. I don't see it, but I was expressing that I hope both sides don't screw this opportunity up.
But after thinking about it more, I'm wondering about what this "20% solution" is. My guess is Iran will be allowed to manufacture 20% of high grade uranium? 20% of what? And the main concern is if Iran manufactures weapons grade uranium, it will be used against countries and regions that Iran does not like. In other words, it will be used against Israel, and whatever Sunni enclave the IRCG does not like.
In addition to the ability to manufacture weapons grade uranium, the concern of the West is Iran ability to secure it against other adversaries, and Iran's potential use.
I don't know what the answer is as Iran is hell bent on obtaining an atomic weapon.
Long live Iran