Follow Christiane on social media:

On Twitter + Facebook + Instagram Amanpour producers on Twitter

What time is Amanpour on CNN?

Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.

Check showtimes to see when Amanpour is on CNN where you are. Or watch online.

What was President Obama's message on Syria?

September 11th, 2013
12:12 PM ET

By Mick Krever, CNN

Mick Krever is the Digital Producer of “Amanpour”

If you watched President Obama’s speech on Syria last night and wondered “what was his message?” you’re not alone.

The original goal was to convince the American people, and the U.S. Congress, to authorize him to use military force against Syria in response to President Assad’s use of chemical weapons.

But what the world saw was not a full-throated endorsement of that goal, but rather a melange of mixed messages.

That’s because now he had to balance the credible threat of force with the fast-moving diplomatic breakthroughs it has produced.

So the President said he had over the past two and a half years resisted calls for military action, and did not want to try to resolve “someone else’s civil war through force.”

Nonetheless, he said, now that Assad had used chemical weapons, it is indeed now time to become involved.

“It is in the national security interests of the United States,” President Obama said, “to respond to the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons through a targeted military strike.”

And to be clear, he added, “the United States military doesn’t do pinpricks. Even a limited strike will send a message to Assad that no other nation can deliver.”

(Just a day earlier, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said: "That is exactly what we’re talking about doing – unbelievably small, limited kind of effort.”)

But hold the phone.

Now that Russia had “indicated a willingness to join with the international community in pushing Assad to give up his chemical weapons,” Obama said, a military strike will be put on hold, though he declared that he had “ordered our military to maintain their current posture to keep the pressure on Assad, and to be in a position to respond if diplomacy fails.”

So Congress, he said, can stand down – for now. Anyway, his allies needed more time to get a vote that could be approved.

“I have, therefore, asked the leaders of Congress to postpone a vote to authorize the use of force while we pursue this diplomatic path.”

The most effective part of President Obama’s speech was the genuine anguish he displayed over the brutal killing of men, women, and hundreds of children by Assad’s chemical weapons – and his call to congress, the American people, and the world to put their conscience first.

“I’d ask every member of Congress, and those of you watching at home tonight, to view those videos of the attack, and then ask: What kind of world will we live in if the United States of America sees a dictator brazenly violate international law with poison gas, and we choose to look the other way?”

Filed under:  From the Amanpour team
soundoff (8 Responses)
  1. Jonathan Onche Edeh

    What's important is not stopping totalitarian rulers from using chemical or biological weapons, but flushing out those totalitarian rulers clothe in the outfit of democracy from creating these weapons in the first place

    September 12, 2013 at 6:43 am | Reply
  2. samoosapur

    We are scared,and bankrupt.

    September 12, 2013 at 11:38 am | Reply
  3. Florentino Klopp

    I am glad to be a visitant of this sodding site ! , regards for this rare info ! .

    December 20, 2020 at 7:15 pm | Reply
  4. Travis Markland

    Nice site, nice and easy on the eyes and great content too. How long have you been blogging for?

    January 12, 2021 at 1:55 am | Reply
  5. Petra Sigala

    Unquestionably believe that which you said. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about worries that they just do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

    January 28, 2021 at 9:58 pm | Reply
  6. Marietta Durant

    March 4, 2021 at 10:04 am | Reply
  7. Marylyn Asbury

    Have you ever heard of second life (sl for short). It is essentially a game where you can do anything you want. sl is literally my second life (pun intended lol). If you would like to see more you can see these Second Life articles and blogs

    May 10, 2021 at 8:38 am | Reply
  8. Eda Dellasciucca

    This was great! I would like you to clean up all this spam though

    May 11, 2021 at 8:59 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.